The Perils of Demagogy


Since the dawn of philosophy as a socio-cultural practice, demagogy has always been a problem at the forefront of philosophy's concerns.
Topping these concerns were questions pertaining to political truth, the nature of what Plato referred to as "pastoral power" and the general moral-political maxims of the polis.
How do all these three concerns fuse in with the modern reality of politics in its global and local dimensions.

Liberal democracy loves Demagogy

Garen Karapetian's picture

Liberal democracy loves Demagogy... because that's the only way that it can work

Populism, essentialism, reductionism of issues... an effective smokescreen for what is really at stakeĀ 

Democracy to the limits

Sevag Asatour's picture

This is what happens when democracy is stretched to its actual limits. Only in a modern age we come to grasp some of what was at stake in democracy in its ancient form - in the Land of Hellenes.
But in a nutshell what would you suggest is "really" at stake.

in the societies where the

Garen Karapetian's picture

in the societies where the modern conditions of production prevail, the society announces itself as a giant accumulation of spectacles. Everything that was once lived directly has moved away into representation.

Living Divisions

Sevag Asatour's picture

And within the confines of the discourse of representation and in and around it, lies the problem of demagoguey. Any political analysis thus, that endorses the moves of demagoguery cannot evade representation even when it explicitly claims to denounce it.

The violent assertion of an opinion has no effect upon the convictions behind its particular premise since it has been asserted violently

Therefore the problem of how to analyse political discourse in its populist form is the problem of recognizing the necessity to axiomize political analysis upon parapolitical premises.

"Everything that was once lived directly has moved away into representation."

Fate lived collectively is now divided exclusively.